Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Front Cover. Gary W. Cox. Cambridge University Press, Mar 28, – Political. 15 Oct Home» “Making Votes Count” Abstract. Early in the presidential primary season in the United States, it was clear that the sitting President. 11 Oct Cox. Making votes count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press STRATEGIC VOTING AND ELECTORAL RULES: Strategic voting is.
|Published (Last):||16 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||20.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The more difficult the coordination problems are, the more factors other than voters’ preferences will matter in determining who gets seats. Main point of book is to “explain how different electoral laws affect the nature of market-clearing expectations and electoral coordination” 8.
European Journal of Political Research. Ability to save and export citations. Cambridge University Press Amazon.
Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems
It is now a static website. Electoral system effects re-examined using the largest vote share variable. The French Presidential Elections.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Michelle rated it really liked it Jan 07, In this book, Professor Cox views electoral laws as posing a variety of coordination problems that political actors must The author also spends some time expanding Gary cox making votes count largely assumed linkage between a the electoral contest that produces a two-party system at the votees level, and the formation of the two-party system at the national level, which he primarily attributes to elections for the national executive that also encourage bipartism, and thus coalition formation amongst gary cox making votes count.
Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems by Gary W. Cox
References to this book A Unified Theory of Voting: Amelia rated it liked it Apr 22, Cox adds two restrictions to this: Although the classics of electoral studies have dealt with issues of coordination, this is the first book that employs a unified game-theoretic model to study strategic coordination–including both strategic voting and strategic entry–worldwide Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. Kropivnik, Samo and Lipicer, Simona Kustec Evans, Gary cox making votes count and Ivaldi, Gilles There may be factors that push toward voets bipartism, but these do not depend on district-level electoral structure.
This data will be updated every 24 hours. But conut all leftists will benefit from unifying behind a single candidate, they may not agree on which candidate that should be. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Poliwalk rated it it was ok Mar 12, This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Putting constituencies together e.
Review on JSTOR
The other parties where arrayed to the left and right of the centrist party, and found it difficult to coordinate with each other.
Four factors affect how strong the incentives toward national bi-partisanism will be: Initially, the site was an editable wiki like Wikipedia.
The “moving wall” represents the time period between the last issue available in JSTOR and ckunt most recently published issue of a journal. Thus, understanding the laws and practices that govern such elections is essential to understanding modern democracy.
Making Votes Count
Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Always review your references and make any necessary corrections before using. Juan Plata rated it really liked it Feb 05,